The readings for this week are at
the heart of a question I’ve been asking myself all semester and Lisa Simon
says is so well “How do we help students engage with texts that pose such
challenges to comprehension and engagement but which have potential to extend
readers’ understanding of self and their role in the world?” (Simon, 135). I
appreciate her suggestions about how to help students understand complex texts
and her use of a specific work, House of
Mirth and the challenges the students faced throughout the novel.
I like her points of contact
exercise a lot. It helps students who may not be represented in the work have a
chance to reflect on the relations of power and class in Wharton’s novel and
that time period 1905. It lets them critique the novel and consider Wharton’s
biases. Her depiction of only the upper class whites in New York ignores the
bigger picture of the immigration boom, the fight of the suffragettes, and
workers rights that were going on in that era. The characters can seem static to
students today, which can make them unmotivated. What can they learn from these
outdated characters?
When reflecting on my own education
I realized that I rarely questioned what an author wrote. I saw their voice as
authoritative and I took it at face value. I believe that a lot of students
relate to texts the same way I did and this is to their detriment. I want my
students to understand that the author doesn’t have the last say. They should
be able to realize that every author has a bias and a purpose for what they are
writing. Questioning and critiquing authors is a valuable skill that extends
beyond the classroom. It is vital when watching the news or viewing
advertisements. It is also crucial when interacting with people. Teenagers can
be cruel. They look down on each other and spread rumors like wildfires. I want
my kiddos to realize that people have motivations behind their actions that may
not be honest or respectable. This means that if they hear a rumor about
someone it doesn’t automatically mean its true. Critical literacy is a good jumping off point
for our students to think and react to situations in their lives.
On another note, I am substituting
for my CT all day on Thursday. I am excited to be in the classroom all day.
This will be a first for me. She says her classes in the afternoon are big and
rowdy. If they’re rowdy with her, how will they act with me?! I’ll let yall
know what happens next Monday… Stay tuned.
Alexis, I appreciate your comment and I think you acknowledge the importance behind author intent and purpose. Language is extremely political and critical literacy approaches it as such. Asking the big questions (who wrote this, why did they write this...and so on and so forth) can really help students approach language analytically. This can expose them to the powerful and political connotations of language and diverse language varieties.
ReplyDeleteI am totally with you on the not critiquing wagon...honestly, I think that I didn't know how to critique "canonical" authors until I got out of undergrad! So I definitely think that it is a very useful skill to develop with students. I even had a conversation about bias with my father-in-law this weekend, and I wanted to have a conversation about what "bias" actually is--he doesn't understand that we should critique everything that we see, not just things that are blatantly ridiculous on one side of the political spectrum or the other. Right on.
ReplyDelete