I got to witness first hand the 9th graders I
observe dominating a lit circle. MY CT asked me to join one group talking about
the book God of Small Things by
Arundhati Roy. Although I’ve never read the book I was confident I’d be able to
help facilitate the conversation and assist if there were any pauses. Oh my
word, was I wrong! The girls got going and didn’t stop. They had such
insightful things to say. They made great connections to their lives and pop
culture references, fairy tales- you name it. It astounded me the depth to
which they engaged in this rather difficult book (for anyone unfamiliar with God of Small Things. it reminds me of a
Gabriel Garcia Marquez book taking place in India rather than Latin America). I
took a vested interest in writing down their great responses but I rarely spoke
because they were doing such a phenomenal job on their own I thought I would
only slow them down!
It was really interesting to see this lit circle and relate
it to the one I did last semester with my Reading II class. They were both the
same in theory, the same roles and everything, but the conversations were
drastically different. This firmly reminds me that every class is different and
an activity that can work for one class can bomb in the next class causing
cricket chirping and painful silences. When I was teaching in Thailand I would
teach a lesson that rocked! I felt so confident I didn’t tweak it whatsoever
for my next class although I knew it was a bit rowdier than the one before it.
This was always a mistake. ALWAYS. The kids would start squirming in their
seats and I would think What? Your friends
in third period LOVED this; you should too! That’s a bad attitude to have
and frankly, a little lazy on my part. I feel like I finally realized that one
lesson plan doesn’t apply to every class but I definitely learned it the hard
way...
Reading Peter Smagorinsky’s chapter on alternatives to
teacher-led discussions were full of activities I could see working in one
class I’ve observed but not the other and vice versa. The kiddos in my class
from last semester would do a fantastic job with the body biography. I can
picture them working in groups and really showing their creative sides a
project like that. However, I shudder to think about implementing a fishbowl in
that class. Even in the class I am in now, though, I feel like a fishbowl would
be tricky to maneuver because the same four or five girls would dominate the
conversation. It’s an activity that wouldn’t work well on either level.
I look forward to the day when I have my own classroom and I
can really try a lot of these activities in-depth and when I have more time
available than just one mini lesson or one class period. I am teaching tomorrow
and after my last time teaching I’ve decided that I want to do more of a turn
and talk activity. I want to make sure every girl’s voice is heard not just
four or five. By having smaller groups and turn and talks more people get to speak.
I grew up in classrooms with teacher-led discussions and I think I learned some
really great things in that setting, but I think that a lot of students benefit
from different discussion structures in the classroom. By sharing their
opinions, experiences, and values the students form a community, a community
that is comfortable with sharing and expressing themselves through discussions
as well as writing.
I think you're right on with having to tweak stuff for every class. When I taught last week, I got to teach 2nd and 3rd period, and it was crazy how different they both were! Also, doing smaller group discussions like you mentioned seems really helpful--I think it lets all the students have a chance to try out their voices and opinions when they might be afraid to do so in front of their whole class!
ReplyDelete